Exercise 2 Week 2
26/2/2015
CIU

Case study - critical thinking 

#2 Orrin: Advise the judge as the Jury Captain what what you believe the verdict should be (innocent / guilty + distribution of money) .

1) Because of manufacture possible problem the accident happened, and on the other hand the mother blames the police about following her son on the curvy roads. 

2) Because police had a reason to follow him because he was risking other drivers life with his bad driving.

3) In conclusion we think it was the mothers mistake to give her young son with a driver licenses a week ago the van at that late time at night, that means the boy doesn't have enough driving experience. Therefore we recommend that the verdict should be that the mother is guilty, and no one else should take the blame. The mother should pay a fine of 10,000 dollars for the manufacture for disturbing there reputation.

Ahmed Alhashmi 
CIU H00269166

Discussion Question #1- Definition of Critical Thinking 

Video number 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmgmgrwpIP4

The video is telling us about critical thinking and how we can use it by asking few questions like how and why, then we can relate to the answers and get  a clear vision on whats right and whats not. More over critical thinking has few steps, first by researching and asking questions. second by ranking information in order by there importance. At last you will get a good output. in addition critical thinking can help us recognize fallacy and avoid it.


Video number 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09krCGboqzw

critical thinking is a skill which is contain four different category:
1-analysing.
2-infrance.
3-interpretation.
4-detective.

3.What is the difference between "critical thinking" and "creative thinking"?

Critical thinking is a skill that you gain that includes identifying ideas to acknowledge what is true and what is not. On the other hand creative thinking is to introduce new ideas that is creative on its own way.